Brandy Dawn Todd v. the State of Texas
This text of Brandy Dawn Todd v. the State of Texas (Brandy Dawn Todd v. the State of Texas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
NO. 03-24-00659-CR
Brandy Dawn Todd, Appellant
v.
The State of Texas, Appellee
FROM THE 51ST DISTRICT COURT OF TOM GREEN COUNTY NO. A-24-0184-SB, THE HONORABLE CARMEN DUSEK, JUDGE PRESIDING
ORDER AND MEMORANDUM OPINION
PER CURIAM
Appellant Brandy Dawn Todd has filed a notice of appeal from her conviction for
possession of methamphetamine in an amount of four grams or more but less than 200 grams.
See Tex. Health & Safety Code § 481.112(d). Todd’s appointed appellate counsel,
Madison Hagopian, has filed a motion to substitute Don Payne as counsel in the above cause. In
her motion, Hagopian advises this Court that she can no longer represent Todd because of a
change of employment.
The trial court has the responsibility for appointing counsel to represent indigent
defendants on appeal as well as the authority to relieve or replace appointed counsel upon a
finding of good cause. See Tex. Code Crim. Proc. arts. 1.051(d), 26.04(j)(2). Accordingly,
when counsel is appointed by the trial court to represent an indigent defendant on appeal, it is the trial court’s responsibility to relieve or replace counsel. See Alvarado v. State, 562 S.W.3d 450,
450–51 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 2014, no pet.); Enriquez v. State, 999 S.W.2d 906, 907
(Tex. App.—Waco 1999, no pet.); Williamson v. State, No. 03-12-00672-CR, 2013 WL 363677,
at *1 (Tex. App.—Austin Jan. 25, 2013, no pet.) (mem. op., not designated for publication).
We therefore dismiss counsel’s motion to substitute, abate the appeal, and remand
the above cause to the trial court. If the trial court determines that good cause exists for
replacing counsel with substitute counsel, the trial court shall remove counsel and promptly
appoint substitute counsel for the appeal of this cause.
The trial court clerk is instructed to file with this Court no later than
March 14, 2025, a supplemental clerk’s record containing copies of the court’s order appointing
substitute counsel and the court’s order allowing counsel’s removal. If the trial court appoints
substitute counsel, he shall file Todd’s brief within thirty days of appointment.
It is so ordered February 28, 2025.
Before Justices Triana, Theofanis, and Crump
Abated and Remanded
Filed: February 28, 2025
Do Not Publish
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Brandy Dawn Todd v. the State of Texas, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brandy-dawn-todd-v-the-state-of-texas-texapp-2025.