Brandy Carnell Vaillant v. State
Opinion
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
NO. 03-18-00734-CR
Brandy Carnell Vaillant, Appellant
v.
The State of Texas, Appellee
FROM THE 207TH DISTRICT COURT OF COMAL COUNTY NO. CR2017-773, THE HONORABLE DON R. BURGESS, JUDGE PRESIDING
ORDER FOR CLERK TO PROVIDE A P P E L L A T E R E C O R D TO A P P E L L A N T
PER CURIAM
Appellant’s court-appointed counsel has filed a motion to withdraw supported by
a brief concluding that the instant appeal is frivolous and without merit. See Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738, 744 (1967). Appellant’s counsel has certified to the Court that he provided copies
of the motion and brief to appellant, advised appellant of his right to examine the appellate
record and file a pro se response, and supplied appellant with a form motion for pro se access to
the appellate record. See Kelly v. State, 436 S.W.3d 313, 319-20 (Tex. Crim. App. 2014).
Appellant has timely filed the motion requesting access to the appellate record with this Court.
Appellant’s pro se motion is granted. We hereby direct the clerk of the trial
court to provide a copy of the reporter’s record and clerk’s record to appellant, and to provide written verification to this Court of the date and manner in which the appellate record was
provided, on or before September 30, 2019. See id. at 321.
It is ordered on September 20, 2019.
Before Justices Goodwin, Baker, and Kelly
Do Not Publish
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Brandy Carnell Vaillant v. State (Brandy Carnell Vaillant v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.