Brandy Briggs v. Michael Astrue, Commissioner
This text of 353 F. App'x 946 (Brandy Briggs v. Michael Astrue, Commissioner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Plaintiff-Appellant Brandy Briggs appeals from the judgment of the district court that affirmed the ruling of Defen *947 dant-Appellee Michael J. Astrue (“the Commissioner”) denying benefits to Briggs. As the parties dispensed with oral argument, we decide this appeal on the basis of the briefs and record. Our review of the record on appeal, including the Report and Recommendations of the magistrate judge on which the district court relied extensively, and the law as applicable to the facts presented, satisfies us that the district court ruled correctly in disposing of this case. For essentially the reasons set forth by the magistrate judge, the judgment of the district court is, in all respects, AFFIRMED.
Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
353 F. App'x 946, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brandy-briggs-v-michael-astrue-commissioner-ca5-2009.