Brandt v. Zoning Board of Appeals of the Town of New Castle

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Brandt v. Zoning Board of Appeals of the Town of New Castle

61 A.D.2d 1012, 402 N.Y.S.2d 974, 1978 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10646

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 13, 1978

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 61 A.D.2d 1012 (Brandt v. Zoning Board of Appeals of the Town of New Castle) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Brandt v. Zoning Board of Appeals of the Town of New Castle, 61 A.D.2d 1012, 402 N.Y.S.2d 974, 1978 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10646 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1978).

Pincite

Opinion

In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, inter alia, to review a determination of the respondent Zoning Board of Appeals of the Town of New Castle which, after a hearing, denied petitioners’ application for a special use permit, petitioners appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of a judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, dated March 24, 1977, as granted the cross motion of the respondent zoning board and dismissed the petition. Judgment affirmed insofar as appealed from, with one bill of costs jointly to respondents, on the opinion of Mr. Justice Dickinson at Special Term (90 Misc 2d 31). Hopkins, J. P., Latham, Damiani and Titone, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, inter alia, to review a determination of the respondent Zoning Board of Appeals of the Town of New Castle which, after a hearing, denied petitioners’ application for a special use permit, petitioners appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of a judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, dated March 24, 1977, as granted the cross motion of the respondent zoning board and dismissed the petition. Judgment affirmed insofar as appealed from, with one bill of costs jointly to respondents, on the opinion of Mr. Justice Dickinson at Special Term (90 Misc 2d 31). Hopkins, J. P., Latham, Damiani and Titone, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

61 A.D.2d 1012, 402 N.Y.S.2d 974, 1978 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10646, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brandt-v-zoning-board-of-appeals-of-the-town-of-new-castle-nyappdiv-1978.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack