Brandt v. York
501 N.E.2d 593, 68 N.Y.2d 889, 508 N.Y.S.2d 944, 1986 N.Y. LEXIS 20607
This text of 501 N.E.2d 593 (Brandt v. York) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Brandt v. York, 501 N.E.2d 593, 68 N.Y.2d 889, 508 N.Y.S.2d 944, 1986 N.Y. LEXIS 20607 (N.Y. 1986).
Opinion
OPINION OF THE COURT
Order affirmed, without costs. Because the proceeding was not commenced in compliance with Election Law §§ 16-102 and 16-116, Supreme Court never acquired jurisdiction. The petition was, therefore, properly dismissed.
Concur: Judges Meyer, Simons, Alexander, Titone and Hancock, Jr. Taking no part: Chief Judge Wachtler and Judge Kaye.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
§ 16-102
New York ELN § 16-102
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
501 N.E.2d 593, 68 N.Y.2d 889, 508 N.Y.S.2d 944, 1986 N.Y. LEXIS 20607, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brandt-v-york-ny-1986.