Brandt v. H. K. Thurber & Co.

1 White & W. 343
CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedFebruary 8, 1877
DocketNo. 19, Tex. L. J., vol. 1, p. 95
StatusPublished

This text of 1 White & W. 343 (Brandt v. H. K. Thurber & Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Brandt v. H. K. Thurber & Co., 1 White & W. 343 (Tex. Ct. App. 1877).

Opinion

Opinion by

Ector, P. J.

§ 640. Plea of payment. Where T. & Co. sold to B. a bill of goods, and B. indorsed on the back of said bill the following order: “Draw on W. Jokust & Co., Galveston, in sixty days from shipment,” held, that an answer setting up this order, but which does not allege that, at the time plaintiffs sold the goods to defendant, they agreed to accept the order as payment of the goods; nor alleges that, at the time specified in said order, he transmitted the amount due plaintiffs to Jokust & Co. at Galveston, with instructions to pay the same to plaintiffs upon their draft; nor that the money is in the hands of Jokust & Co., subject to the order of plaintiffs, does not present a plea of payment, and is not good as a ■ defense on demurrer.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1 White & W. 343, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brandt-v-h-k-thurber-co-texapp-1877.