Brandt v. Buckhout

1 Cai. Cas. 113, 1 Cole. & Cai. Cas. 186
CourtNew York Supreme Court
DecidedAugust 15, 1803
StatusPublished

This text of 1 Cai. Cas. 113 (Brandt v. Buckhout) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Brandt v. Buckhout, 1 Cai. Cas. 113, 1 Cole. & Cai. Cas. 186 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1803).

Opinion

Per curiam.

The defendant has not accounted for his delay; if that be not done, and the application be not immediately after the laches, the default is waived, and cannot now be taken advantage of.

[114]*114Woods lipped the .court would order the plaintiff to stipulate.

- Per curiam. He is not bound to stipulate.

Spencer prayed costs for resisting the application.

- Per curiam. Let the Plaintiff take them.

, Ordered, That the defendant take nothing by Ms motion* and pay the plaintiff his costs of opposing.

Radcliff and Livingston, justices, absent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1 Cai. Cas. 113, 1 Cole. & Cai. Cas. 186, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brandt-v-buckhout-nysupct-1803.