Brands v. Cassedy
This text of 5 A.2d 685 (Brands v. Cassedy) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
We have carefully examined the pleading and proofs in this case, the arguments of counsel and the conclusions of the learned vice-chancellor, and we are of the opinion that his conclusions as to the facts and his application of the law thereto were in all respects proper.
The decree is affirmed.
For affirmance — Ti-ie Chibe-Justice, Parker, Case, Bodine, Donges, Heher, Perskie, Porter, Heteield, Dear, Wells, WolesKeil, Raeeerty, Hague, JJ. 14.
For reversal — None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
5 A.2d 685, 125 N.J. Eq. 346, 1939 N.J. LEXIS 657, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brands-v-cassedy-nj-1939.