Brands v. Cassedy

5 A.2d 685, 125 N.J. Eq. 346, 1939 N.J. LEXIS 657
CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey
DecidedApril 21, 1939
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 5 A.2d 685 (Brands v. Cassedy) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Brands v. Cassedy, 5 A.2d 685, 125 N.J. Eq. 346, 1939 N.J. LEXIS 657 (N.J. 1939).

Opinion

Pee Curiam.

We have carefully examined the pleading and proofs in this case, the arguments of counsel and the conclusions of the learned vice-chancellor, and we are of the opinion that his conclusions as to the facts and his application of the law thereto were in all respects proper.

The decree is affirmed.

For affirmance — Ti-ie Chibe-Justice, Parker, Case, Bodine, Donges, Heher, Perskie, Porter, Heteield, Dear, Wells, WolesKeil, Raeeerty, Hague, JJ. 14.

For reversal — None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Goodpasture v. Goodpasture
278 A.2d 531 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1971)
Drumm v. Pavlick
57 A.2d 662 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1948)
Wujciak v. Wujciak
55 A.2d 164 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1947)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
5 A.2d 685, 125 N.J. Eq. 346, 1939 N.J. LEXIS 657, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brands-v-cassedy-nj-1939.