Brandon Zavala v. State

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedOctober 19, 2007
Docket07-07-00394-CR
StatusPublished

This text of Brandon Zavala v. State (Brandon Zavala v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Brandon Zavala v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2007).

Opinion

NO. 07-07-0394-CR


IN THE COURT OF APPEALS


FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS


AT AMARILLO


PANEL B


OCTOBER 19, 2007

______________________________


BRANDON ZAVALA, APPELLANT


V.


THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE
_________________________________


FROM THE 242ND DISTRICT COURT OF HALE COUNTY;


NO. A 13799-0008; HONORABLE ED SELF, JUDGE
_______________________________


Before QUINN, C.J., and CAMPBELL and HANCOCK, JJ.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

On August 27, 2007, the trial court convicted appellant Brandon Zavala of possession of marijuana, more than four ounces but less than one pound, and sentenced him to two years confinement in a state jail. See Tex. Health & Safety Code Ann. § 481.121 (a),(b)(3) (Vernon 2003). On September 20, 2007, appellant filed a motion for new trial and notice of appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 21.4(a), 26.2(a)(2). The clerk of the trial court has provided us with documentation that on October 11, 2007, the trial court granted appellant's motion for new trial.

If the trial court grants a new trial, it restores the case to its position before the former trial. See Tex. R. App. P. 21.9. Because there is no longer an adjudicated issue for appellate review, we have no jurisdiction over the case except to dismiss the appeal. See Waller v. State, 931 S.W.2d 640, 643-44 (Tex.App.-Dallas 1996, no pet.).

Consequently, the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction.



James T. Campbell

Justice



Do not publish.

r of Disqualification and, Alternatively, Recusal . . . .



(Emphasis in original).

We conclude relator's contention that this Court has jurisdiction to issue writs of mandamus directed to Judge Moore because she seeks the writs in his capacity as a district judge is contrary to the record.

Accordingly, the motions for rehearing are overruled.



Don H. Reavis



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Waller v. State
931 S.W.2d 640 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1996)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Brandon Zavala v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brandon-zavala-v-state-texapp-2007.