Brandon v. Superior Court

11 P. 128, 2 Cal. Unrep. 654
California Supreme Court·Decided May 21, 1886·No. No. 9066·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

McKEE, J.

It is manifest, from the facts alleged in the ' petition, that the justice’s court whose judgments we are asked to review had jurisdiction of the subject matter, and of the person of the petitioner, as defendant, in the action in which the judgment was rendered (sections 114, 894, Code of Civil Procedure); and that, by the appeal taken from the judgment, the superior court acquired jurisdiction to try the action de novo (sections 976, 980, Id.). And as it does not appear by any allegations in the petition that either the superior court or the justice’s court exceeded its jurisdiction in any part of the proceedings in the case, the application for a writ of review must be denied. So ordered.

We concur: Morrison, C. J.; Myrick, J.; McKinstry, J.; Ross, J.; Thornton, J.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Brandon v. Superior Court, 11 P. 128, 2 Cal. Unrep. 654 (Cal. 1886).

11 P. 128 (Brandon v. Superior Court) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Vaught v. District Court of the Fourth Judicial District
260 P. 160 (Idaho Supreme Court, 1927)
Fisher v. Union County
72 P. 797 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1903)