Brandon v. Superior Court

11 P. 128, 2 Cal. Unrep. 654
CourtCalifornia Supreme Court
DecidedMay 21, 1886
DocketNo. 9066
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 11 P. 128 (Brandon v. Superior Court) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Brandon v. Superior Court, 11 P. 128, 2 Cal. Unrep. 654 (Cal. 1886).

Opinion

McKEE, J.

It is manifest, from the facts alleged in the ' petition, that the justice’s court whose judgments we are asked to review had jurisdiction of the subject matter, and of the person of the petitioner, as defendant, in the action in which the judgment was rendered (sections 114, 894, Code of Civil Procedure); and that, by the appeal taken from the judgment, the superior court acquired jurisdiction to try the action de novo (sections 976, 980, Id.). And as it does not appear by any allegations in the petition that either the superior court or the justice’s court exceeded its jurisdiction in any part of the proceedings in the case, the application for a writ of review must be denied. So ordered.

We concur: Morrison, C. J.; Myrick, J.; McKinstry, J.; Ross, J.; Thornton, J.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Vaught v. District Court of the Fourth Judicial District
260 P. 160 (Idaho Supreme Court, 1927)
Fisher v. Union County
72 P. 797 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1903)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
11 P. 128, 2 Cal. Unrep. 654, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brandon-v-superior-court-cal-1886.