Brandon v. Pittsford
1 Brayt. 183
Opinion
The Court decided, that after the expiration of one year of the pauper’s residence, the officer could not be permitted to amend his return, and confirmed the decision of the Judges-
The motion for new trial was dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Brandon v. Pittsford, 1 Brayt. 183 (Vt. 1819).
1 Brayt. 183 (Brandon v. Pittsford) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.