Brandon (Tony) Vs. Dist. Ct. (State)
This text of Brandon (Tony) Vs. Dist. Ct. (State) (Brandon (Tony) Vs. Dist. Ct. (State)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nevada Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
TONY MORRIS BRANDON, No. 79536 Petitioner, vs. THE ELEVENTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA, ie FILED IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF SEP 1 9 2019 MINERAL, BROWN Respondent, E COURT
and DENBY CLERK THE STATE OF NEVADA, Real Party in Interest.
ORDER DENYING PETITION
This is an original pro se petition for a writ of mandamus in which petitioner seeks a writ directing the district court to resolve his petition for sentence modification. Problematically, petitioner has not provided this court with exhibits or other documentation that would support his claims for relief. See NRAP 21(a)(4) (providing the petitioner shall submit an appendix containing all documents "essential to understand the matters set forth in the petition"). Therefore, without deciding on the merits of the claims raised, we decline to exercise our original jurisdiction in this matter, see NRS 34.160; NRAP 21(b); Pan v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 120 Nev. 222, 228,
SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA 1g - 3ffes3 (0) I947A 44DIA,
l 88 P.3d 840, 844 (2004) ("Petitioned ] cardies] the burden of demonstrating that extraordinary relief is warranted."). Accordingly, we ORDER the petition DENIED.
Gibbons
hae. , J. Hardesty , J. Pickering
cc: Tony Morris Brandon Attorney General/Carson City Mineral County District Attorney Mineral County Clerk
SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA
(0) 1947A 2 14.
a
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Brandon (Tony) Vs. Dist. Ct. (State), Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brandon-tony-vs-dist-ct-state-nev-2019.