Brandon (Tony) Vs. Dist. Ct. (State)

Nevada Supreme Court·Decided September 19, 2019·No. 79536·Published

Opinion

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

TONY MORRIS BRANDON, No. 79536 Petitioner, vs. THE ELEVENTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA, ie FILED IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF

SEP 1 9 2019

MINERAL,

BROWN

Respondent, E COURT

and DENBY CLERK THE STATE OF NEVADA, Real Party in Interest.

ORDER DENYING PETITION

This is an original pro se petition for a writ of mandamus in which petitioner seeks a writ directing the district court to resolve his petition for sentence modification.

Problematically, petitioner has not provided this court with exhibits or other documentation that would support his claims for relief. See NRAP 21(a)(4) (providing the petitioner shall submit an appendix containing all documents "essential to understand the matters set forth in the petition").

Therefore, without deciding on the merits of the claims raised, we decline to exercise our original jurisdiction in this matter, see NRS 34.160; NRAP 21(b); Pan v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 120 Nev. 222, 228,

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA 1g - 3ffes3

(0) I947A 44DIA,

l

88 P.3d 840, 844 (2004) ("Petitioned ] cardies] the burden of demonstrating that extraordinary relief is warranted."). Accordingly, we ORDER the petition DENIED.

Gibbons

hae. , J.

Hardesty

, J.

Pickering

cc: Tony Morris Brandon Attorney General/Carson City Mineral County District Attorney Mineral County Clerk

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA

(0) 1947A 2 14.

a

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Brandon (Tony) Vs. Dist. Ct. (State), (Neb. 2019).

Brandon (Tony) Vs. Dist. Ct. (State) (Brandon (Tony) Vs. Dist. Ct. (State)) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related