Brandon Stollings v. Ryobi Technologies, Inc.

Opinion

United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit Chicago, Illinois 60604

August 13, 2013

Before

DANIEL A. MANION, Circuit Judge

JOHN DANIEL TINDER, Circuit Judge

DAVID F. HAMILTON, Circuit Judge

No. 12-2984

BRANDON STOLLINGS, Appeal from the United States District Court Plaintiff-Appellant, for the Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division. v. No. 08 C 4006 RYOBI TECHNOLOGIES, INC. and ONE WORLD TECHNOLOGIES, INC., Gary S. Feinerman, Defendants-Appellees. Judge.

ORDER

The opinion issued on August 2, 2013 is hereby AMENDED as follows:

On page 19, the fifth sentence in the full paragraph before heading “B” is amended as follows: “The court then concluded that Graham’s testimony had to be excluded under Federal Rule of Evidence Civil Procedure 702 because the fact that the 90 percent effectiveness input was not reliable rendered Graham’s entire opinion unreliable.” As amended the sentence now reads: “The court then concluded that Graham’s testimony had to be excluded under Federal Rule of Evidence 702 because the fact that the 90 percent effectiveness input was not reliable rendered Graham’s entire opinion unreliable.”

On page 27, the second sentence in the paragraph starting after heading “III” is amended by deleting the period at the end of the phrase “correctly states the law” and a comma is inserted in its place, just before the citation to Lewis v. City of Chicago Police Dep’t.