Brandon Portillo v. the State of Texas
This text of Brandon Portillo v. the State of Texas (Brandon Portillo v. the State of Texas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
NUMBER 13-22-00228-CR
COURT OF APPEALS
THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
CORPUS CHRISTI – EDINBURG
BRANDON PORTILLO, Appellant,
v.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee.
On appeal from the 94th District Court of Nueces County, Texas.
ORDER OF ABATEMENT
Before Justices Benavides, Hinojosa, and Silva Order Per Curiam
This appeal is before the Court on its own motion. Upon review of the reporter’s
record, portions of the record are lost, missing, or destroyed. Upon review, state’s exhibit
3 in volume 13 is listed as a CD consisting of medical records and is password protected.
Furthermore, the exhibit page indicates the item is “unable to view when copied.” Due to this status, we construe this portion of the record as lost, missing, or destroyed.
This sequence of events requires us to effectuate our responsibility to avoid further
delay and to preserve the parties’ rights. See TEX. R. APP. P. 35.3(b), (c). Accordingly,
this appeal is abated and the cause remanded to the trial court. The trial court shall cause
a hearing to be held to determine if the reporter’s record, specifically state’s exhibit 3 in
volume 13, or any other part thereof, is missing, lost, or destroyed. Furthermore, the court
is instructed to make findings under TEX. R. APP. P. 34.6(f), if necessary. Otherwise, the
court shall determine what steps are necessary to ensure the prompt preparation of a
reporter’s record and shall enter any orders required to avoid further delay and to preserve
the parties’ rights. The trial court is instructed to take notice of the Uniform Format Manual
for Texas Reporters’ Records, section 8.3, which specifically states computer files must
not be password-protected.
The trial court shall cause its findings, together with any orders it may enter, to be
included in a supplemental clerk’s record. Furthermore, the trial court shall cause a
supplemental reporter’s record of any proceedings to be prepared. The supplemental
clerk’s record and supplemental reporter’s record shall be filed with the Clerk of this
Court on or before the expiration of thirty days from the date of this order.
PER CURIAM
Do not publish. TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).
Delivered and filed on the 18th day of August, 2022.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Brandon Portillo v. the State of Texas, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brandon-portillo-v-the-state-of-texas-texapp-2022.