Brandon Michael Packer v. State
This text of Brandon Michael Packer v. State (Brandon Michael Packer v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
DISMISS and Opinion Filed September 18, 2020
S In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-20-00742-CR
BRANDON MICHAEL PACKER, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
On Appeal from the 283rd Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. F16-40480-T
MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Schenck, Osborne, and Partida-Kipness Opinion by Justice Osborne On July 28, 2017, after Brandon Michael Packer pleaded guilty to possession
of less than one gram of heroin, the trial court deferred adjudication of guilt and
placed appellant on deferred adjudication probation for two years. The trial court
later extended appellant’s community supervision until July 27, 2021. On June 4,
2020, the State filed a motion to proceed with adjudication of guilt, alleging
appellant violated various conditions of probation. Following a July 13, 2020
hearing, the trial court denied the State’s motion and continued appellant on deferred adjudication probation. Appellant’s notice of appeal from that decision was filed in
this Court on August 14, 2020.
As a general rule, an appellate court may consider appeals by criminal
defendants only after conviction. Wright v. State, 969 S.W.2d 588, 589 (Tex. App.—
Dallas 1998, no pet.). With regard to deferred adjudication, the Texas Legislature
has authorized appeal of only two types of orders: (1) an order granting deferred
adjudication, and (2) an order imposing punishment accompanying an adjudication
of guilt. Davis v. State, 195 S.W.3d 708, 711 (Tex. Crim. App. 2006). Orders
modifying the terms or conditions of deferred adjudication are not in themselves
appealable. Id.
Here, there is no judgment of conviction; rather, the trial court continued
appellant on deferred adjudication. Under these circumstances, we do not have
jurisdiction. See id.
We dismiss this appeal for lack of jurisdiction.
/Leslie Osborne/ LESLIE OSBORNE Do Not Publish JUSTICE TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b) 200742F.U05
–2– S Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas JUDGMENT
BRANDON MICHAEL PACKER, On Appeal from the 283rd Judicial Appellant District Court, Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. F16-40480-T. No. 05-20-00742-CR V. Opinion delivered by Justice Osborne. Justices Schenck and THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee Partida-Kipness participating.
Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, we DISMISS this appeal for want of jurisdiction.
Judgment entered September 18, 2020
–3–
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Brandon Michael Packer v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brandon-michael-packer-v-state-texapp-2020.