Brandon Leroy Stockdall v. State of Iowa
This text of Brandon Leroy Stockdall v. State of Iowa (Brandon Leroy Stockdall v. State of Iowa) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Iowa primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA
No. 20-1339 Filed August 18, 2021
BRANDON LEROY STOCKDALL, Petitioner-Appellant,
vs.
STATE OF IOWA, Respondent-Appellee. ________________________________________________________________
Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Polk County, Lawrence P. McLellan,
Judge.
Brandon Stockdall appeals the summary disposition of his application for
postconviction relief. AFFIRMED.
Raya D. Dimitrova of Carr Law Firm, P.L.C., Des Moines, for appellant.
Thomas J. Miller, Attorney General, and Benjamin Parrott, Assistant
Attorney General, for appellee State.
Considered by Mullins, P.J., and May and Ahlers, JJ. 2
MULLINS, Judge.
Sentence was imposed upon Brandon Stockdall’s criminal conviction in July
2015. No appeal was taken. He filed an application for postconviction relief (PCR)
in May 2020. The State moved for summary disposition based on the expiration
of the three-year statute of limitations contained in Iowa Code section 822.3
(2020). In his resistance, Stockdall argued “the court should find that equitable
tolling applies to this case,” but acknowledged appellate courts “have consistently
rejected equitable tolling under Iowa Code chapter 822,” while asserting “that
should change.” He additionally asserted he was not aware of his ability to pursue
PCR “until the spring of 2020,” and he pursued said ability as soon as he became
aware.
Following a brief hearing, the court granted the State’s motion for summary
disposition, finding the matter time-barred and rejecting the request for the
applicability of equitable tolling. On appeal, Stockdall argues we “should adopt
equitable tolling to actions arising under Iowa Code chapter 822.” “[T]his court has
frequently held that equitable tolling does not apply to section 822.3.” Smith v.
State, No. 19-0384, 2020 WL 110398, at *1 (Iowa Ct. App. Jan. 9, 2020); id. at *1
n.2 (collecting cases); see Lang v. State, No. 20-0510, 2021 WL 1400074, at *1
(Iowa Ct. App. Apr 14, 2021) (repeating the same holding); Johnson v. State, No.
19-1949, 2021 WL 210700, at *4 (Iowa Ct. App. Jan. 21, 2021) (same); see also
Khouanmany v. State, No. 19-0966, 2021 WL 616125, at *2 (Iowa Ct. App. Feb.
17, 2021) (noting Allison v. State, 914 N.W.2d 866, 891 (Iowa 2019) “did not adopt
equitable tolling”). 3
We see no reason to change course, so we affirm the entry of summary
disposition.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Brandon Leroy Stockdall v. State of Iowa, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brandon-leroy-stockdall-v-state-of-iowa-iowactapp-2021.