Brandon Le and Michael Valentine v. Don H. Konipol and Managed Mortgage Investment Fund, LP
Opinion
Opinion issued November 1, 2012
In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas
NO. 01-11-00633-CV
BRANDON LE AND MICHAEL VALENTINE, Appellants
V.
DON H. KONIPOL AND MANAGED MORTGAGE INVESTMENT FUND, LP, Appellees
On Appeal from the 189th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2011-36465
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Appellants, Brandon Le and Michael Valentine, have neither established
indigence nor paid, or made arrangements to pay, the fee for preparing the clerk=s record. See TEX. R. APP. P. 20.1 (listing requirements for establishing indigence),
37.3(b) (allowing dismissal of appeal if no clerk’s record filed due to appellant’s
fault). After being notified that this appeal was subject to dismissal, appellants did
not adequately respond. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(b) (allowing involuntary
dismissal).
We dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. We dismiss all pending
motions as moot.
PER CURIAM
Panel consists of Justices Jennings, Higley, and Sharp.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Brandon Le and Michael Valentine v. Don H. Konipol and Managed Mortgage Investment Fund, LP (Brandon Le and Michael Valentine v. Don H. Konipol and Managed Mortgage Investment Fund, LP) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.