Brandon Le and Michael Valentine v. Don H. Konipol and Managed Mortgage Investment Fund, LP

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided November 1, 2012·No. 01-11-00633-CV·Published

Opinion

Opinion issued November 1, 2012

In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas

NO. 01-11-00633-CV

BRANDON LE AND MICHAEL VALENTINE, Appellants

V.

DON H. KONIPOL AND MANAGED MORTGAGE INVESTMENT FUND, LP, Appellees

On Appeal from the 189th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2011-36465

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellants, Brandon Le and Michael Valentine, have neither established

indigence nor paid, or made arrangements to pay, the fee for preparing the clerk=s record. See TEX. R. APP. P. 20.1 (listing requirements for establishing indigence),

37.3(b) (allowing dismissal of appeal if no clerk’s record filed due to appellant’s

fault). After being notified that this appeal was subject to dismissal, appellants did

not adequately respond. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(b) (allowing involuntary

dismissal).

We dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. We dismiss all pending

motions as moot.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Jennings, Higley, and Sharp.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Brandon Le and Michael Valentine v. Don H. Konipol and Managed Mortgage Investment Fund, LP, (Tex. Ct. App. 2012).

Brandon Le and Michael Valentine v. Don H. Konipol and Managed Mortgage Investment Fund, LP (Brandon Le and Michael Valentine v. Don H. Konipol and Managed Mortgage Investment Fund, LP) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.