Brandon Geoffrey Scottie Weed as Representative of the Estate of Scottie Weed, Chris Dudley, Individually and as Representative of the Estate of Ana Weed, and Virginia Montalvo v. Farmers Texas County Mutual Insurance Company
This text of Brandon Geoffrey Scottie Weed as Representative of the Estate of Scottie Weed, Chris Dudley, Individually and as Representative of the Estate of Ana Weed, and Virginia Montalvo v. Farmers Texas County Mutual Insurance Company (Brandon Geoffrey Scottie Weed as Representative of the Estate of Scottie Weed, Chris Dudley, Individually and as Representative of the Estate of Ana Weed, and Virginia Montalvo v. Farmers Texas County Mutual Insurance Company) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Opinion issued June 27, 2024
In The
Court of Appeals For The
First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-24-00200-CV ——————————— BRANDON GEOFFREY SCOTTIE WEED AS REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATE OF SCOTTIE WEED, CHRIS DUDLEY, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATE OF ANA WEED, AND VIRGINIA MONTALVO, Appellants V. FARMERS TEXAS COUNTY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellee
On Appeal from 295th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Case No. 2022-36231
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Appellants, Brandon Geoffrey Scottie Weed as Representative of the Estate
of Scottie Weed, Chris Dudley, Individually and as Representative of the Estate of Ana Weed, and Virginia Montalvo, filed their notice of appeal on March 11, 2024.
Appellants did not pay their appellate filing fee or establish indigence for purposes
of appellate costs. See TEX. R. APP. P. 5, 20.1. The Clerk of this Court notified
Appellants that unless they paid the appellate filing fee by May 2, 2024, her appeal
could be dismissed. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(b). To date, Appellants have not paid
the appellate filing fee nor established indigence for purposes of appellate costs.
Appellants also failed to pay, or make arrangements to pay, the fee for
preparing the clerk’s record. See TEX. R. CIV. P. 145; TEX. R. APP. P. 34.1. We
notified Appellants that their appeal could be dismissed for want of prosecution if
the clerk’s record was not filed. See TEX. R. APP. P. 37.3(a), (b). We directed
Appellants to submit written evidence from the trial court clerk by May 13, 2024,
reflecting she paid, or made arrangements to pay, the fee for preparing the clerk’s
record. To date, Appellants have not responded to this Court’s notice and the clerk’s
record has not been filed.
We dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See TEX. R. APP. P. 37.3(b),
42.3(b)–(c). We dismiss any pending motions as moot.
PER CURIAM
Panel consists of Justices Hightower, Rivas-Molloy, and Farris.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Brandon Geoffrey Scottie Weed as Representative of the Estate of Scottie Weed, Chris Dudley, Individually and as Representative of the Estate of Ana Weed, and Virginia Montalvo v. Farmers Texas County Mutual Insurance Company, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brandon-geoffrey-scottie-weed-as-representative-of-the-estate-of-scottie-texapp-2024.