Brandon Edward Coleman v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided June 15, 2018·No. 04-18-00089-CR·Published

Opinion

Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

June 15, 2018

No. 04-18-00089-CR

Brandon Edward COLEMAN,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 399th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2017CR7012 Honorable Frank J. Castro, Judge Presiding

ORDER

Appellate counsel’s motions to withdraw are GRANTED. Since appellant is indigent, new appellate counsel must be appointed. It is therefore ORDERED that these appeals are ABATED to the trial court. See Duncan v. State, 653 S.W.2d 38, 40 (Tex. Crim. App. 1983) (holding that appellate courts may abate appeals so that trial court can assure appellant has effective assistance of counsel). The trial court is ORDERED to appoint new appellate counsel and to cause the trial court clerk to file a supplemental clerk’s record in each of these appeals no later than July 2, 2018, containing documentation of such appointment. After the supplemental clerk’s records are filed, the appeals will be reinstated on the docket of this court, and a new deadline will be set for the filing of appellant’s brief. Appellant’s motion for extension of time to file appellant’s brief is MOOT.

Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 15th day of June, 2018.

KEITH E. HOTTLE, Clerk of Court

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Brandon Edward Coleman v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2018).

Brandon Edward Coleman v. State (Brandon Edward Coleman v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Duncan v. Evans
653 S.W.2d 38 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1983)