Brandon Dmichael Lively v. the State of Texas
This text of Brandon Dmichael Lively v. the State of Texas (Brandon Dmichael Lively v. the State of Texas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin) primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
NO. 03-25-00589-CR
Brandon Dmichael Lively, Appellant
v.
The State of Texas, Appellee
FROM THE 207TH DISTRICT COURT OF COMAL COUNTY NO. CR2023-473B, THE HONORABLE TRACIE WRIGHT-RENEAU, JUDGE PRESIDING
ORDER AND MEMORANDUM OPINION
PER CURIAM
Appellant Brandon Dmichael Lively is appealing from his conviction for
continuous sexual assault of a young child. See Tex. Penal Code § 21.02(b). Appellant’s brief
was originally due February 27, 2026. After this Court granted a motion requesting an extension
of time to file his brief, appellant’s brief is currently due May 12, 2026. Appellant’s appointed
counsel has now filed a second motion for extension of time to file a brief “and alternative
request for substitution of counsel.” In the motion, counsel “admits that his continued
representation is not in the best interests of Appellant and would respectfully request that this
case be remanded to the trial court for appointment of new counsel.”
The trial court has the responsibility for appointing counsel to represent indigent
defendants on appeal as well as the authority to relieve or replace appointed counsel upon a finding of good cause. See Tex. Code Crim. Proc. arts. 1.051(d), 26.04(j)(2). Accordingly,
when counsel is appointed by the trial court to represent an indigent defendant on appeal, it is the
trial court’s responsibility to relieve or replace counsel. See Alvarado v. State, 562 S.W.3d 450,
450–51 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 2014, no pet.); Enriquez v. State, 999 S.W.2d 906, 907
(Tex. App.—Waco 1999, no pet.); Williamson v. State, No. 03-12-00672-CR, 2013 WL 363677,
at *1 (Tex. App.—Austin Jan. 25, 2013, no pet.) (mem. op., not designated for publication).
We therefore dismiss counsel’s motion, abate the appeal, and remand the cause to
the trial court. If the trial court determines that good cause exists for replacing counsel with
substitute counsel, the trial court shall remove counsel and promptly appoint substitute counsel
for the appeal of this cause. The trial court clerk is instructed to file with this Court no later than
May 22, 2026, a record of the hearing as well as a supplemental clerk’s record containing copies
of the court’s order appointing substitute counsel and the court’s order allowing counsel’s
removal. See Tex. R. App. P. 34.5(c)(2), 34.6(d) (authorizing supplementation of clerk’s and
reporter’s records). Upon our reinstatement of this appeal from abatement, our Clerk will notify
appellant of his new briefing deadline.
It is so ordered April 28, 2026.
Before Justices Triana, Kelly, and Ellis
Abated and Remanded
Filed: April 28, 2026
Do Not Publish
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Brandon Dmichael Lively v. the State of Texas, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brandon-dmichael-lively-v-the-state-of-texas-txctapp3-2026.