Brandon Damond Woods v. State

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedJanuary 21, 2020
Docket05-19-00832-CR
StatusPublished

This text of Brandon Damond Woods v. State (Brandon Damond Woods v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Brandon Damond Woods v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2020).

Opinion

Order entered January 21, 2020

In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-19-00832-CR

BRANDON DAMOND WOODS, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 366th Judicial District Court Collin County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 366-81312-2018

ORDER Before the Court is retained counsel Kristin Brown’s January 3, 2020 motion to abate this

appeal. In the motion, counsel states she has thoroughly reviewed the record but has been unable

to identify any viable issues. Counsel asks the Court to abate the appeal to determine whether

appellant wishes to pursue the appeal and if so, for counsel to be appointed.

On determining that an appeal is frivolous, a retained attorney must inform this Court that

the appeal has no merit and seek leave to withdraw by filing a motion that complies with rule 6.5

of the rules of appellate procedure. See Rivera v. State, 130 S.W.3d 454, 458 (Tex. App. —

Corpus Christi‒Edinburgh 2004, no pet.); Nguyen v. State, 11 S.W.3d 376, 379 (Tex. App. —

Houston [14th Dist.] 2000, no pet.); Pena v. State, 932 S.W.2d 31, 32 (Tex. App. —El Paso

1995; see also Oldham v. State, 894 S.W.2d 561, 562 (Tex. App. —Waco 1995) (addressing former rule 7); see also TEX. R. APP. P. 6.5 (motion for leave to withdraw must contain: list of

current deadlines and settings in case; party’s name and last known address and telephone

number; statement that copy of motion was delivered to party; and statement that party was

notified in writing of right to object to motion; motion must be delivered to party in person or

mailed—both by certified and by first-class mail—to party at party’s last known address).

We DENY the motion to abate.

/s/ LANA MYERS JUSTICE

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Rivera v. State
130 S.W.3d 454 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 2004)
Oldham v. State
894 S.W.2d 561 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1995)
Nguyen v. State
11 S.W.3d 376 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 2000)
Pena v. State
932 S.W.2d 31 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1995)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Brandon Damond Woods v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brandon-damond-woods-v-state-texapp-2020.