Brandon Burleson v. State
This text of Brandon Burleson v. State (Brandon Burleson v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In The Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana
No. 06-18-00184-CR
BRANDON BURLESON, Appellant
V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 2 Hays County, Texas Trial Court No. 15-0977CR
Before Morriss, C.J., Moseley and Burgess, JJ. ORDER
Brandon Burleson has filed an appeal from a judgment of conviction entered by the County
Court at Law No. 2 of Hays County. Attorney David K. Sergi was retained to represent Burleson
on appeal. Sergi has filed a motion to withdraw in this Court averring that Burleson has not met
his obligations under the parties’ contract of employment. Sergi’s motion satisfied the
requirements of Rule 6.5 of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure, and we hereby grant the
motion to withdraw.
In light of these circumstances, we abate this case to the trial court so that it may conduct
whatever hearings are necessary to make the following determinations: (1) whether Burleson still
desires to prosecute this appeal and (2) whether Burleson is indigent and entitled to the
appointment of counsel to represent him in this appeal. If Burleson is determined to be indigent,
then the trial court shall appoint counsel to represent him in this appeal.
The trial court may enter any orders necessary to implement these directives. Any hearing
shall be conducted by the trial court within fifteen days of the date of this order. Appropriate
orders and findings shall be sent to this Court in the form of a supplemental clerk’s record within
ten days of the date of the hearing contemplated by this order. The reporter’s record of any hearing
shall be filed with this Court within ten days of the date of the hearing contemplated by this order.
All appellate timetables are stayed and will resume on our receipt of the supplemental
appellate record.
2 IT IS SO ORDERED.
BY THE COURT
Date: December 13, 2018
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Brandon Burleson v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brandon-burleson-v-state-texapp-2018.