Brandon Briskin v. Shopify, Inc.

101 F.4th 706
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided May 14, 2024·No. 22-15815·Published·Cited by 7 cases

Opinion

FOR PUBLICATION FILED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAY 14 2024 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

BRANDON BRISKIN, on behalf of himself No. 22-15815 and those similarly situated, D.C. No. 4:21-cv-06269-PJH Plaintiff-Appellant, Northern District of California, Oakland v. ORDER SHOPIFY, INC.; SHOPIFY (USA), INC.; SHOPIFY PAYMENTS (USA), INC.,

Defendants-Appellees.

MURGUIA, Chief Judge:

Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused active judges, it is ordered that

this case be reheard en banc pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 35(a)

and Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion is vacated.

Judges Owens and Lee did not participate in the deliberations or vote in this

case.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Brandon Briskin v. Shopify, Inc., 101 F.4th 706 (9th Cir. 2024).

101 F.4th 706 (Brandon Briskin v. Shopify, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related