Brandon Briskin v. Shopify, Inc.
This text of 101 F.4th 706 (Brandon Briskin v. Shopify, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
FOR PUBLICATION FILED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAY 14 2024 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
BRANDON BRISKIN, on behalf of himself No. 22-15815 and those similarly situated, D.C. No. 4:21-cv-06269-PJH Plaintiff-Appellant, Northern District of California, Oakland v. ORDER SHOPIFY, INC.; SHOPIFY (USA), INC.; SHOPIFY PAYMENTS (USA), INC.,
Defendants-Appellees.
MURGUIA, Chief Judge:
Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused active judges, it is ordered that
this case be reheard en banc pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 35(a)
and Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion is vacated.
Judges Owens and Lee did not participate in the deliberations or vote in this
case.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
101 F.4th 706, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brandon-briskin-v-shopify-inc-ca9-2024.