Brandon Benard Bright v. State

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedMarch 18, 2015
Docket12-15-00045-CR
StatusPublished

This text of Brandon Benard Bright v. State (Brandon Benard Bright v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Brandon Benard Bright v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2015).

Opinion

NO. 12-15-00045-CR

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT

TYLER, TEXAS

BRANDON BENARD BRIGHT, § APPEAL FROM THE 7TH APPELLANT

V. § JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT

THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE § SMITH COUNTY, TEXAS

MEMORANDUM OPINION PER CURIAM This appeal is being dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Following a guilty plea, Appellant was convicted of aggravated assault with a deadly weapon and sentenced to imprisonment for twenty years. In a criminal case, the notice of appeal must be filed within thirty days after sentence is imposed or within ninety days after that date if a motion for new trial is filed. TEX. R. APP. P. 26.2(a). Appellant’s sentence was imposed on September 29, 2014, and he did not file a motion for new trial. Therefore, his notice of appeal was due to have been filed no later than October 29, 2014. However, Appellant did not file his notice of appeal until February 20, 2015. Because Appellant’s notice of appeal was not filed on or before October 29, 2014, it was untimely, and this court has no jurisdiction of the appeal. On February 24, 2015, this court notified Appellant, pursuant to Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure 37.2 and 44.3, that his notice of appeal was untimely and there was no timely motion for an extension of time to file the notice of appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 26.2(a)(1), 26.3. Appellant was further informed that the appeal would be dismissed unless the information in this appeal was amended, on or before March 6, 2015, to show the jurisdiction of this court. That deadline has passed, and Appellant has not shown the jurisdiction of this court. Because this court is not authorized to extend the time for perfecting an appeal except as provided by Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure 26.1 and 26.3, the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. See Slaton v. State, 981 S.W.2d 208, 210 (Tex. Crim. App. 1998); Olivo v. State, 918 S.W.2d 519, 522 (Tex. Crim. App. 1996). Opinion delivered March 18, 2015. Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Hoyle, J., and Neeley, J.

(DO NOT PUBLISH)

2 COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT OF TEXAS

JUDGMENT

MARCH 18, 2015

BRANDON BENARD BRIGHT, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

Appeal from the 7th District Court of Smith County, Texas (Tr.Ct.No. 007-0861-14)

THIS CAUSE came to be heard on the appellate record; and the same being considered, it is the opinion of this court that this court is without jurisdiction of the appeal, and that the appeal should be dismissed. It is therefore ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED by this court that this appeal be, and the same is, hereby dismissed for want of jurisdiction; and that this decision be certified to the court below for observance. By per curiam opinion. Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Hoyle, J. and Neeley, J.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Slaton v. State
981 S.W.2d 208 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1998)
Olivo v. State
918 S.W.2d 519 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1996)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Brandon Benard Bright v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brandon-benard-bright-v-state-texapp-2015.