Brandli v. Micrus Endovascular Corporation

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Brandli v. Micrus Endovascular Corporation. Read the opinion of the Court — 209 F. Supp. 3d 356
District Court, District of Columbia·Decided September 21, 2016·No. Civil Action No. 2011-1743·Published

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

____________________________________ ) KAREN BRANDLI, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 11-1743 (PLF) ) MICRUS ENDOVASCULAR ) CORPORATION, et al., ) ) Defendants. ) ____________________________________)

ORDER

For the reasons stated in the accompanying Opinion issued this same day, it is

hereby

ORDERED that Counts 4 and 5, having been withdrawn, are DISMISSED; it is

FURTHER ORDERED that defendants’ motion for summary judgment on all

remaining counts [Dkt. 29] is GRANTED; it is

FURTHER ORDERED that judgment is entered for defendants on Counts 1, 2

and 3 of the Amended Complaint; and it is

FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court shall remove this case from

the docket of this Court. This is a final appealable order. See FED. R. APP. P. 4(a).

SO ORDERED.

/s/______________________ PAUL L. FRIEDMAN DATE: September 21, 2016 United States District Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Brandli v. Micrus Endovascular Corporation, (D.D.C. 2016).

Brandli v. Micrus Endovascular Corporation (Brandli v. Micrus Endovascular Corporation) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.