Brandl v. Oltmer

383 N.W.2d 764, 222 Neb. 342, 1986 Neb. LEXIS 901
CourtNebraska Supreme Court
DecidedMarch 28, 1986
DocketNo. 84-930
StatusPublished

This text of 383 N.W.2d 764 (Brandl v. Oltmer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nebraska Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Brandl v. Oltmer, 383 N.W.2d 764, 222 Neb. 342, 1986 Neb. LEXIS 901 (Neb. 1986).

Opinion

Hastings, J.

For the second time Mary M. Oltmer has appealed from an order appointing a conservator of her estate. The earlier case, affirming such appointment, is found at 214 Neb. 830, 336 N.W.2d 560 (1983).

In the present case the brief filed by the appellant does not contain any assignments of error regarding the decision or judgment of the district court. The record does not disclose any plain error prejudicial to the appellant.

As previously held by this court, in the absence of any assigned error, the judgment of the district court will be and is affirmed. Baggett v. City of Omaha, 220 Neb. 805, 373 N.W.2d 391 (1985).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In Re Estate of Oltmer
336 N.W.2d 560 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1983)
Baggett v. City of Omaha
373 N.W.2d 391 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1985)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
383 N.W.2d 764, 222 Neb. 342, 1986 Neb. LEXIS 901, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brandl-v-oltmer-neb-1986.