Brandi Cramer v. Village of Oakley
This text of Brandi Cramer v. Village of Oakley (Brandi Cramer v. Village of Oakley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan
April 5, 2017 Stephen J. Markman, Chief Justice
Robert P. Young, Jr. Brian K. Zahra 154209 Bridget M. McCormack David F. Viviano Richard H. Bernstein Joan L. Larsen, BRANDI CRAMER f/k/a BRANDI Justices BITTERMAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v SC: 154209 COA: 330736 Shiawassee CC: 15-007371-CZ VILLAGE OF OAKLEY, Defendant-Appellee.
_________________________________________/
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the June 23, 2016 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.305(H)(1), in lieu of granting leave to appeal, we VACATE as moot Part III of the Court of Appeals opinion, see 316 Mich App ___ n 1, ___ n 7 (2016), and we REMAND this case to the Shiawassee Circuit Court for dismissal of the plaintiff’s Freedom of Information Act claims. See Federated Publications, Inc v Lansing, 467 Mich 98, 101 (2002). In all other respects, leave to appeal is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the remaining question presented should be reviewed by this Court. Thus, the award of attorney fees, costs, and disbursements remains vacated.
I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. April 5, 2017 s0329 Clerk
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Brandi Cramer v. Village of Oakley, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brandi-cramer-v-village-of-oakley-mich-2017.