Brandes v. City of Deerfield Beach

186 So. 2d 6, 1966 Fla. LEXIS 3652
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedApril 18, 1966
Docket34873
StatusPublished
Cited by10 cases

This text of 186 So. 2d 6 (Brandes v. City of Deerfield Beach) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Brandes v. City of Deerfield Beach, 186 So. 2d 6, 1966 Fla. LEXIS 3652 (Fla. 1966).

Opinion

186 So.2d 6 (1966)

Paul L. BRANDES et al., Appellants,
v.
CITY OF DEERFIELD BEACH, Appellee.

No. 34873.

Supreme Court of Florida.

April 18, 1966.
Rehearing Denied May 23, 1966.

*7 Delford P. Richey, Pompano Beach, for appellants.

Robert T. Carlile, Deerfield Beach, for appellee.

BARNS, PAUL D., Justice

This is a taxpayers' appeal from a final decree validating the proposed issuance of municipal bonds secured by pledge of certain tax revenues by the City of Deerfield Beach. We reverse.

The City, of a population of approximately 15,000 inhabitants, proposes issuance of $1,500,000 Excise Tax Improvement Bonds maturing over a period of 30 years, requiring an annual debt service of approximately $86,000.00. The Resolution authorizing the issuance of these bonds pledges as security for their payment its revenue derived from (1) "Cigarette Taxes", (2) "Franchise Taxes" from Florida Power & Light Co. and Southern Bell Telephone & Telegraph Company, (3) "Occupational License Taxes" and, (4) "Alcoholic Beverage Taxes".

On August 19, 1965, (the same day of the passage of a Resolution authorizing the issuance of the above mentioned bonds of $1,500,000.00) the City signed a lease with Deerstad, Inc., a corporation, reciting that Deerstad held an option to purchase a designated 40 acre tract of land which Deerstad would assign to the City and in turn the City would exercise the option and purchase the land and lease it to Deerstad and the City would construct thereon various buildings and structures and would furnish certain equipment, facilities and furnishings needed and required of Deerstad by its sub-lessee, the Pittsburg Athletic Company, Inc., a corporation (owner of the "Pittsburg Pirates" baseball team.).

The purpose of the bond issue is to obtain funds with which to acquire a parcel of land and to construct thereon facilities to be used as spring training headquarters for the Pittsburg Pirates, a major league *8 baseball team. One hundred forty thousand dollars ($140,000.00) of the proceeds will be placed in escrow to secure the payment of a prior bond issue to which the Cigarette Taxes of the City are presently pledged. It is necessary to secure the payment of the prior bonds in order that the Cigarette Taxes may be pledged to the payment of the $1,500,000.00 bond issue. The $1,360,000.00 balance of the proceeds will be used to acquire land and to construct spring training quarters for the Pirates. Once completed, the facility will be effectively leased to Deerstad; that corporation will, in turn, effectively lease the project to the Pirates.

The Lease Contract between the City and Deerstad (hereinafter referred to as "lease") provides that upon default or termination of the lease for any reason, the City may take over the obligations of Deerstad to the Pirates as follows:

"Upon default in this Lease Contract by CORPORATION, or upon expiration of the term or termination hereof, CITY or any person or party acting under CITY shall be entitled to all the rights and shall assume and discharge all the obligations of CORPORATION under the said Agreement and Lease between CORPORATION and Pittsburgh Athletic Company, Inc. with the same effect as if said Agreement and Lease had been executed by CITY or such other person or party rather than CORPORATION and as if the name of CITY or such other person or party had been set forth therein in each place where the name of CORPORATION appears. Without limiting the generality of the foregoing, CITY or such other person or party, as the case may be, shall be entitled to receive and collect all rentals and other amounts payable by Pittsburgh Athletic Company, Inc. under said Agreement and Lease and to exercise the remedies provided therein on the occurrence and continuance of any default by Pittsburgh Athletic Company, Inc."

These obligations are fixed by an Agreement and Lease between Deerstad and the Pirates (hereinafter referred to as "sublease").

The facilities to be provided by the City, as stated in the Bond Resolution, are as follows:

"* * * [I]mprovements in said City consisting of, but not limited to, a municipal stadium seating approximately five thousand people, together with other facilities related thereto, including, but not limited to, baseball fields, dormitory and dining facilities, parking areas, outdoor lighting facilities, and the acquisition of land in connection therewith, together with other purposes necessary, incidental or appurtenant thereto, all substantially in accordance with the plans and specifications to be approved by this Commission, * * *."

Exhibit A attached to the Lease sets out the details as to what the City will be required to furnish. Among other things, the City must furnish a stadium, four additional baseball fields, four movable batting cages, a sliding pit, running track, lighting for all fields, field maintenance house with observation tower, clubhouse, housing for 274 people (including furniture, bedding, etc.), dining room for 180 people, kitchen for 220 people (including utensils, dinnerware, silverware, and glassware), and parking facilities. All of the facilities are to be as agreed upon by the City and the Pirates. Should the Lease terminate, the City may be substituted for Deerstad in the sublease.

In operation of the project, it is estimated that the City must pay yearly the sum of $58,000.00 for all maintenance, including painting, plumbing and other major and minor repairs; all utilities, "including without limitation, water, electricity, gas, heat, garbage disposal and sewage", (except telephone and telegraph) furnished by the City; maintenance of the playing fields and related areas, including the concession *9 areas. Should the City for its protection be required to take over the obligations of Deerstad to the Pirates under the sublease, the City would then be obligated to "provide, pay and be responsible for all necessary ticket sellers, ticket takers, ushers, police, public address announcers, parking lot attendants and other necessary personnel [and] all necessary personnel to operate the concession stands, parking areas and all other activities * * *" and Deerstad's obligation to sell $18,000.00 in preseason tickets.

The term of the Lease between the City and Deerstad is five (5) years, with the City being obligated to proceed under Section 132 of its Charter to offer the property for a thirty-year lease. In such an offering, the City must require all bidders to agree to assume Deerstad's obligations under the sublease, must require capitalization of the bidder at least equal to that of Deerstad, and must offer the property at the same minimum terms as the present five-year lease.

As rental on this project, Deerstad is to pay an amount equal to the debt service on the $1,360,000.00 in bonds attributable to the project and fifty percent of the net profits in excess of prior years' losses. Deerstad will receive all rentals on the project and all concessions and other income-producing rights, except those reserved by the Pirates. In return for this rental, the City must acquire the land, construct the facility, furnish the equipment, maintain the project, provide free municipal occupational licenses and pay all ad valorem taxes, if any, and insure the project against casualty losses. Should Deerstad fail, the City would have to pay off the bonds, of course, and may take over Deerstad's rights and obligations to the Pirates in the protection of the City's interest.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

CLEAN v. State
928 P.2d 1054 (Washington Supreme Court, 1996)
Libertarian Party of Wisconsin v. State
546 N.W.2d 424 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1996)
Lifteau v. Metropolitan Sports Facilities Commission
270 N.W.2d 749 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1978)
Markham v. MacCabee Investments, Inc.
343 So. 2d 16 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1977)
Ago
Florida Attorney General Reports, 1975
MacCabee Investments, Inc. v. Markham
311 So. 2d 718 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1975)
State v. County of Dade
210 So. 2d 200 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1968)
State v. Jacksonville Port Authority
204 So. 2d 881 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1967)
State v. Manatee County Port Authority
193 So. 2d 162 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1966)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
186 So. 2d 6, 1966 Fla. LEXIS 3652, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brandes-v-city-of-deerfield-beach-fla-1966.