Brandenstein & Co. v. Douglas

32 S.E. 341, 105 Ga. 845, 1899 Ga. LEXIS 786
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedFebruary 3, 1899
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 32 S.E. 341 (Brandenstein & Co. v. Douglas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Brandenstein & Co. v. Douglas, 32 S.E. 341, 105 Ga. 845, 1899 Ga. LEXIS 786 (Ga. 1899).

Opinion

Cobb, J.

This being an action for damages alleged to have been sustained by the breach of a contract entered into between the plaintiffs and an agent of the defendants, in which it was stipulated that the defendants would deliver to the plaintiffs certain goods, which was not done, and the uncontradicted evidence in the case, showing that the authority of the agent was limited to receiving-proposals, his principals reserving the right to reject the same, and that the contract was not approved by such principals, a verdict in favor of the plaintiffs was contrary to law, and should have been set aside. Judgment reversed.

Ail the Justices concurring.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Dannenberg Co. v. Hughes
116 S.E. 892 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1923)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
32 S.E. 341, 105 Ga. 845, 1899 Ga. LEXIS 786, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brandenstein-co-v-douglas-ga-1899.