Brandenburg v. Harbeson

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Brandenburg v. Harbeson

183 S.W. 479, 169 Ky. 233, 1916 Ky. LEXIS 664

DecidedMarch 17, 1916

StatusPublished

This text of 183 S.W. 479 (Brandenburg v. Harbeson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Kentucky primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Brandenburg v. Harbeson, 183 S.W. 479, 169 Ky. 233, 1916 Ky. LEXIS 664 (Ky. Ct. App. 1916).

Pincite

Opinion

Opinion of the Court by

Judge Settle

Denying writ.

This case is a companion to that of John G. White, et al., v. M. L. Harbeson, Judge, this day decided. In this case, as in that, a writ of prohibition is asked of this court to prevent M. L. Harbeson, judge of ithe Kenton circuit court, law and equity division, from further proceeding in determining any .matter in controversy between W. N. Hind, receiver, and the petitioners, in the action brought by the Skillman-Martin Printing Company v. The Kentucky Fire Insurance Co., pending in the Kenton circuit court, law and equity division. The [234]*234grounds alleged in the petition for the writ being identical with those urged in the case of John G. White, et al., v. M. J. Harbeson, Judge, the opinion in that case is conclusive of the rights of the petitioners in this case, wherefore the demurrer to the petition is sustained and the writ of prohibition prayed is refused. Whole court sitting.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion of the Court by

Judge Settle

Denying writ.

This case is a companion to that of John G. White, et al., v. M. L. Harbeson, Judge, this day decided. In this case, as in that, a writ of prohibition is asked of this court to prevent M. L. Harbeson, judge of ithe Kenton circuit court, law and equity division, from further proceeding in determining any .matter in controversy between W. N. Hind, receiver, and the petitioners, in the action brought by the Skillman-Martin Printing Company v. The Kentucky Fire Insurance Co., pending in the Kenton circuit court, law and equity division. The [234]*234grounds alleged in the petition for the writ being identical with those urged in the case of John G. White, et al., v. M. J. Harbeson, Judge, the opinion in that case is conclusive of the rights of the petitioners in this case, wherefore the demurrer to the petition is sustained and the writ of prohibition prayed is refused. Whole court sitting.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

183 S.W. 479, 169 Ky. 233, 1916 Ky. LEXIS 664, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brandenburg-v-harbeson-kyctapp-1916.