Brandenburg v. Coxe

77 A. 455, 228 Pa. 212, 1910 Pa. LEXIS 456
CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedMay 9, 1910
DocketAppeal, No. 392
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 77 A. 455 (Brandenburg v. Coxe) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Brandenburg v. Coxe, 77 A. 455, 228 Pa. 212, 1910 Pa. LEXIS 456 (Pa. 1910).

Opinion

Per Curiam,

We concur in the view expressed in the opinion of Judge Endlich, on which we affirm the judgment appealed from, that there was not an adoption by the receiver of the contract between the plaintiffs and the Keystone Wagon Works, as a continuing contract, but merely the use by him of orders received by the corporation before his appointment. The plaintiffs’ claim for orders procured for and accepted by the corporation was complete at the time of the appointment of the receiver and for it they have the same remedies as other creditors.

The judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Guaranty Trust Co. v. Seaboard Air Line Ry. Co.
14 F. Supp. 555 (E.D. Virginia, 1935)
Brandenburg v. Brooke
45 Pa. Super. 490 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1911)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
77 A. 455, 228 Pa. 212, 1910 Pa. LEXIS 456, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brandenburg-v-coxe-pa-1910.