Brandenburg v. City of Covington

Supreme Court of Georgia

Brandenburg v. City of Covington

111 S.E. 574, 153 Ga. 92, 1922 Ga. LEXIS 22

CourtSupreme Court of Georgia

DecidedMarch 4, 1922

DocketNo. 2595

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 111 S.E. 574 (Brandenburg v. City of Covington) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Brandenburg v. City of Covington, 111 S.E. 574, 153 Ga. 92, 1922 Ga. LEXIS 22 (Ga. 1922).

Pincite

Opinions

Peb Curiam.

1. A paragraph of a tax ordinance of a city is not illegal, unreasonable, or void upon its face, which provides: “ Picture shows or electric theatre per year $100.00. Permit required for use of gallery. Permit in discretion of mayor and council.”

2. Under conflicting evidence upon the question as 'to whether the plaintiff in error had made application to the city authorities for the issuance of the permit to operate a gallery, it does not appear that the court abused his discretion in refusing an interlocutory injunction. The foregoing ruling necessarily disposes of the case; and it is unnecessary to pass upon the constitutional questions involved.

■Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur, except Gilbert, J., absent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI