Branden J. Bailey v. State of Florida

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided June 20, 2018·No. 18-1466·Published

Opinion

FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA

No. 1D18-1466

BRANDEN J. BAILEY, Petitioner, v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Respondent.

Petition for Writ of Certiorari—Original Jurisdiction.

June 20, 2018

PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of certiorari is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. See Landmark at Crescent Ridge LP v. Everest Fin., Inc., 219 So. 3d 218, 219 (Fla. 1st DCA 2017) (explaining that where the threshold requirement of irreparable harm is not established, the petition for writ of certiorari must be dismissed).

WOLF, JAY, and WINSOR, JJ., concur.

Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331.

Branden J. Bailey, pro se, Petitioner. Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Branden J. Bailey v. State of Florida, (Fla. Ct. App. 2018).

Branden J. Bailey v. State of Florida (Branden J. Bailey v. State of Florida) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Landmark At Crescent Ridge LP v. Everest Financial, Inc., a California Corporation
219 So. 3d 218 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2017)