BRANDEN CORRIVEAU v. STATE OF FLORIDA
This text of BRANDEN CORRIVEAU v. STATE OF FLORIDA (BRANDEN CORRIVEAU v. STATE OF FLORIDA) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT
BRANDEN M. CORRIVEAU, Appellant,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee.
Nos. 4D21-1803 and 4D21-1804
[January 13, 2022]
Consolidated appeal of orders denying rule 3.850 motion from the Circuit Court for the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, Martin County; Sherwood Bauer, Jr., Judge; L.T. Case Nos. 43-2012-CF-000892 and 43- 2012-CF-001280.
Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Paul Edward Petillo, Assistant Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.
Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Kimberly T. Acuña, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed.
GROSS, DAMOORGIAN and KUNTZ, JJ., concur.
* * *
Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
BRANDEN CORRIVEAU v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/branden-corriveau-v-state-of-florida-fladistctapp-2022.