Brandeis v. Allen

D. Nebraska

Brandeis v. Allen

22 F.2d 415, 6 A.F.T.R. (P-H) 7044, 1927 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1558

CourtDistrict Court, D. Nebraska

DecidedJuly 15, 1927

DocketNos. 2082, 2083

StatusPublished

This text of 22 F.2d 415 (Brandeis v. Allen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, D. Nebraska primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Brandeis v. Allen, 22 F.2d 415, 6 A.F.T.R. (P-H) 7044, 1927 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1558 (D. Neb. 1927).

Pincite

Opinion

WOODBOUGH, District Judge.

The plaintiff accepted and is in receipt of an annuity given her by the will of her deceased husband, in lieu of the statutory rights in his property to which she was entitled as a widow. Upon protest she has paid an income tax on her annuity receipts from 1920 to 1924, inclusive, which she now sues to recover back. Her claim is that hor annuity should be deemed to have been purchased by her relinquishment of her statutory rights as widow, and therefore such annuity is not income.

I am of opinion that the decision of the Circuit Court of Appeals in the Second Circuit in Warner v. Walsh, 15 F.(2d)367, is determinative of the question in favor of the plaintiff. Plaintiff’s annuity should be deemed to have been bought and paid for by hor relinquishment to the estate of hor statutory right as widow, and her annual receipts did not come to her as income, and therefore are not taxable as income.

It is ordered that the demurrer of the government bo overruled, to which defendant duly excepts, and the exception is allowed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

WOODBOUGH, District Judge.

The plaintiff accepted and is in receipt of an annuity given her by the will of her deceased husband, in lieu of the statutory rights in his property to which she was entitled as a widow. Upon protest she has paid an income tax on her annuity receipts from 1920 to 1924, inclusive, which she now sues to recover back. Her claim is that hor annuity should be deemed to have been purchased by her relinquishment of her statutory rights as widow, and therefore such annuity is not income.

I am of opinion that the decision of the Circuit Court of Appeals in the Second Circuit in Warner v. Walsh, 15 F.(2d)367, is determinative of the question in favor of the plaintiff. Plaintiff’s annuity should be deemed to have been bought and paid for by hor relinquishment to the estate of hor statutory right as widow, and her annual receipts did not come to her as income, and therefore are not taxable as income.

It is ordered that the demurrer of the government bo overruled, to which defendant duly excepts, and the exception is allowed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

22 F.2d 415, 6 A.F.T.R. (P-H) 7044, 1927 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1558, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brandeis-v-allen-ned-1927.