Brand v. State
This text of 32 A.D.2d 1027 (Brand v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Motion for permission to proceed as a poor person denied, without costs, and without prejudice to its renewal on notice to all interested parties (!CPLR 1101, subd. [c]) and on a proper showing of sufficient facts to enable the court to ascertain the merit of appellant’s contentions (CPLR 1101, subd. [a]). Gibson, P. J., Herlihy, Reynolds, Staley, Jr., and Cooke, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
32 A.D.2d 1027, 1969 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3315, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brand-v-state-nyappdiv-1969.