Brand v. State

129 So. 3d 500, 2014 WL 85207, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 319
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJanuary 9, 2014
DocketNo. 1D12-6063
StatusPublished

This text of 129 So. 3d 500 (Brand v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Brand v. State, 129 So. 3d 500, 2014 WL 85207, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 319 (Fla. Ct. App. 2014).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

In this Anders1 appeal, we AFFIRM the violation of probation findings and three year prison sentence without comment. But, it appears Appellant’s recently-corrected judgment and sentence does not comport with the clear direction of the trial court’s March 26, 2013 order. The Clerk of Court has a purely ministerial duty to carry out the explicit terms of the trial court’s directive. We trust that the Clerk will enter a corrected judgment and sentence in accord with, and required by, the trial court’s order.

WOLF, VAN NORTWICK, and CLARK, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
129 So. 3d 500, 2014 WL 85207, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 319, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brand-v-state-fladistctapp-2014.