Brand v. Pennsylvania Railroad

141 A. 925, 292 Pa. 578, 1928 Pa. LEXIS 655
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided March 14, 1928·No. Appeal, 152·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Pee Curiam,

In this action of trespass for personal injuries to the minor plaintiff and losses resulting to his father, the jury found verdicts against defendant, upon which judgments were entered for both plaintiffs. Defendant has appealed and complains because the trial court refused to enter judgment in its favor notwithstanding the verdict; also because the court below refused to grant a new trial.

We have read the printed record and are not convinced of error. No useful purpose would be served by a statement of the facts or by a review of the evidence; it is sufficient to say the issues involved were for the jury, and no abuse of discretion appears in refusing a new trial.

The judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Brand v. Pennsylvania Railroad, 141 A. 925, 292 Pa. 578, 1928 Pa. LEXIS 655 (Pa. 1928).

141 A. 925 (Brand v. Pennsylvania Railroad) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Casey v. Siciliano
165 A. 1 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1932)