Brand v. Godwin

9 N.Y.S. 743, 31 N.Y. St. Rep. 276, 15 Daly 469, 1890 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 362
New York Court of Common Pleas·Decided May 5, 1890·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Bischoff, J.

The questions presented on this appeal, while not entirely novel, having in the main been settled by the decisions of the highest appellate court of this state, yet present some features not clearly embraced within those decisions; and for the reason that the liability of the defendant is highly penal, and that many other pending actions, arising out of the subject-matter of this appeal, will, in their result, depend upon the adjudication in this case, I think that permission should be extended to the appellant to appeal to the court of appeals. Jackson v. Purchase, 1 Hilt. 357. All concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Brand v. Godwin, 9 N.Y.S. 743, 31 N.Y. St. Rep. 276, 15 Daly 469, 1890 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 362 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1890).

9 N.Y.S. 743 (Brand v. Godwin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Lynip v. Alturas School District
155 P. 109 (California Court of Appeal, 1915)
Lynch v. Sauer
16 Misc. 362 (Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1896)
Glyn v. Miner
27 N.Y.S. 341 (New York Court of Common Pleas, 1894)
Young v. Godwin
19 N.Y.S. 656 (New York Court of Common Pleas, 1892)