Brand v. ELLIOTT ON BEHALF OF ELLIOTT

610 So. 2d 37, 17 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 2701
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedDecember 4, 1992
Docket92-1091
StatusPublished
Cited by6 cases

This text of 610 So. 2d 37 (Brand v. ELLIOTT ON BEHALF OF ELLIOTT) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Brand v. ELLIOTT ON BEHALF OF ELLIOTT, 610 So. 2d 37, 17 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 2701 (Fla. Ct. App. 1992).

Opinion

610 So.2d 37 (1992)

Judy BRAND, et al., Appellants,
v.
Debra J. ELLIOTT, on Behalf of Wendy Lynn ELLIOTT, Appellee.

No. 92-1091.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

December 4, 1992.

*38 George J. Dramis and Michael F. Sutton of Gurney & Handley, P.A., Orlando, for appellants.

J. Brock McClane of McClane Professional Ass'n, Orlando, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The final order granting permanent injunctive relief pursuant to section 784.046, Florida Statutes, is reversed because the trial court failed to afford the parties the "full hearing" required by section 784.046(6)(c), Florida Statutes. A "full hearing", as that term is used in the statute, contemplates an opportunity to be heard which may include the presentation of evidence. See generally Homeopathic Physicians v. Department of Professional Regulation, 487 So.2d 374 (Fla. 5th DCA 1986); Mike Smith Pontiac v. Smith, 486 So.2d 89 (Fla. 5th DCA 1986). The respondents below attempted to offer evidence but the court essentially announced that it did not have time to conduct an evidentiary hearing. In the absence of a clear stipulation of counsel, argument of counsel alone does not constitute evidence from which the trial court can determine the propriety, vel non, of granting injunctive relief.

REVERSED AND REMANDED.

COBB, COWART and DIAMANTIS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Pena v. Rodriguez
273 So. 3d 237 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2019)
Charlotte County v. Grant Medical Transportation, Inc.
68 So. 3d 920 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2011)
Porter v. Hoeft
951 So. 2d 51 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2007)
Matrix Systems, Inc. v. Odebrecht Contractors of Florida, Inc.
753 So. 2d 652 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2000)
Spurgiesz v. Graves
750 So. 2d 771 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2000)
Segui v. Nester
745 So. 2d 591 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1999)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
610 So. 2d 37, 17 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 2701, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brand-v-elliott-on-behalf-of-elliott-fladistctapp-1992.