Brand Scaffold Rental & Erection, Inc. v. Missouri Property & Casualty Insurance Guaranty Ass'n

Missouri Court of Appeals

Brand Scaffold Rental & Erection, Inc. v. Missouri Property & Casualty Insurance Guaranty Ass'n

456 S.W.3d 72, 2015 Mo. App. LEXIS 185

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided February 24, 2015·No. WD 77391·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Appellant Brand Scaffold Rental and Erection, Inc., n/k/a Brand Energy Services, LLC, appeals from the Circuit Court of Cole County’s grant of summary judgment in favor of Respondent Missouri Property and Casualty Insurance Guaranty Association (“MIGA”). Appellant contends that the trial court erred in granting summary judgment because the trial court erroneously concluded that Appellant failed to present a “covered claim” for . which MIGA would be liable. After a thorough review of the record, we conclude that MIGA established it is entitled to judgment as a matter of law; thus, the trial court did not err by granting summary judgment in MIGA’s favor. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a formal, published opinion; however, a memorandum explaining the reasons for our decision has been provided to the parties.

Judgment affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Appellant Brand Scaffold Rental and Erection, Inc., n/k/a Brand Energy Services, LLC, appeals from the Circuit Court of Cole County’s grant of summary judgment in favor of Respondent Missouri Property and Casualty Insurance Guaranty Association (“MIGA”). Appellant contends that the trial court erred in granting summary judgment because the trial court erroneously concluded that Appellant failed to present a “covered claim” for . which MIGA would be liable. After a thorough review of the record, we conclude that MIGA established it is entitled to judgment as a matter of law; thus, the trial court did not err by granting summary judgment in MIGA’s favor. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a formal, published opinion; however, a memorandum explaining the reasons for our decision has been provided to the parties.

Judgment affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Brand Scaffold Rental & Erection, Inc. v. Missouri Property & Casualty Insurance Guaranty Ass'n, 456 S.W.3d 72, 2015 Mo. App. LEXIS 185 (Mo. Ct. App. 2015).

Pincite

456 S.W.3d 72 (Brand Scaffold Rental & Erection, Inc. v. Missouri Property & Casualty Insurance Guaranty Ass'n) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.