Branch v. Mallory

70 S.E. 177, 8 Ga. App. 797, 1911 Ga. App. LEXIS 151
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedFebruary 15, 1911
Docket2667
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 70 S.E. 177 (Branch v. Mallory) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Branch v. Mallory, 70 S.E. 177, 8 Ga. App. 797, 1911 Ga. App. LEXIS 151 (Ga. Ct. App. 1911).

Opinion

Hill, C. J.

A party plaintiff in error is essential to the prosecution of a writ of error, and where no one is named or otherwise disclosed by the bill of exceptions as plaintiff in error, the writ, of error will be dismissed. This ftefect in the bill of exceptions is not amendable by the record in this court, as, without a plaintiff in error, there is no case. Swift v. [798]*798Thomas, 101 Ga. 89 (.28 S. E. 618); Orr v. Webb, 112 Ga. 806 (38 S. E. 98). Here there was no offer to amend. Writ of error dismissed.

Decided February 15, 1911. F. G. Foster, for Branch. J. J. Strickland, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Board of Road & Revenue Commissioners v. Collins
94 Ga. App. 562 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1956)
BOARD OF ROAD & REVENUE COMMISSIONERS OF CANDLER COUNTY v. Collins
95 S.E.2d 758 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1956)
Bankers Health & Life Insurance v. North
23 S.E.2d 449 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1942)
Johnson v. Estate of Farkas
96 S.E. 392 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1918)
Hendricks v. Rogers
95 S.E. 1009 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1918)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
70 S.E. 177, 8 Ga. App. 797, 1911 Ga. App. LEXIS 151, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/branch-v-mallory-gactapp-1911.