Branch of the State Bank of Iowa v. White
12 Iowa 141
Opinion
Under § 3174, of the Revision of 1860, when the party asks an attachment upon the ground that defendant is “about to dispose of, or remove his property out of the State, without leaving sufficient remaining for the payment of his debts,” it is not necessary to aver an intention to defraud creditors. It was the intention of the legislature to make the causes as there stated, in numerical order, distinct and independant of any other cause.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Branch of the State Bank of Iowa v. White, 12 Iowa 141 (iowa 1861).
12 Iowa 141 (Branch of the State Bank of Iowa v. White) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Durr v. Hervey
44 Ark. 301 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1884)
Mingus v. McLeod
25 Iowa 452 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1868)
Sherrill v. Fay
14 Iowa 292 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1862)