Branca v. Law-Syl Realty Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Branca v. Law-Syl Realty Corp.

282 A.D. 715, 122 N.Y.S.2d 220, 1953 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4775

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 15, 1953

StatusPublished

This text of 282 A.D. 715 (Branca v. Law-Syl Realty Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Branca v. Law-Syl Realty Corp., 282 A.D. 715, 122 N.Y.S.2d 220, 1953 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4775 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1953).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action by plaintiff wife to recover damages for personal injuries, and by plaintiff husband for expenses, loss of services and consortium, defendant Law-Syl Realty Corp. appeals from a judgment in favor of plaintiffs and against it, rendered upon the verdict of a jury. Judgment of the City Court of Mount Vernon reversed on the facts and new trial granted, with costs to abide the event, unless plaintiff Emma Branca stipulate, within ten days after the entry of an order hereon, to reduce the verdict insofar as it is in her favor to the sum of $1,500, in which event the judgment, as so reduced, is unanimously affirmed, without costs. In our opinion the amount of the award for plaintiff Emma Branca was excessive. Present- — Carswell, Acting P. J., Wenzel, MacCrate, Schmidt and Beldoek, JJ. [See post, p. 839.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action by plaintiff wife to recover damages for personal injuries, and by plaintiff husband for expenses, loss of services and consortium, defendant Law-Syl Realty Corp. appeals from a judgment in favor of plaintiffs and against it, rendered upon the verdict of a jury. Judgment of the City Court of Mount Vernon reversed on the facts and new trial granted, with costs to abide the event, unless plaintiff Emma Branca stipulate, within ten days after the entry of an order hereon, to reduce the verdict insofar as it is in her favor to the sum of $1,500, in which event the judgment, as so reduced, is unanimously affirmed, without costs. In our opinion the amount of the award for plaintiff Emma Branca was excessive. Present- — Carswell, Acting P. J., Wenzel, MacCrate, Schmidt and Beldoek, JJ. [See post, p. 839.]

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

282 A.D. 715, 122 N.Y.S.2d 220, 1953 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4775, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/branca-v-law-syl-realty-corp-nyappdiv-1953.