Bramwell v. O'Brien

• Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
• Decided: May 29, 2008
• Docket: 08-6081
• Status: Unpublished

Opinion

Certiorari dismissed, December 8, 2008

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-6081

MARLON BRAMWELL,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

TERRY O’BRIEN, Warden, USP Lee,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Glen E. Conrad, District Judge. (7:07-cv-00429-gec-mfu)

Submitted: May 22, 2008 Decided: May 29, 2008

Before MOTZ and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Marlon Bramwell, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Marlon Bramwell appeals the district court’s order

dismissing his petition filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000),

which the district court construed as a complaint filed pursuant to

Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403

U.S. 388 (1971), and dismissed under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b) (2000),

and its order denying reconsideration. We have reviewed the record

and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the

reasons stated by the district court. See Bramwell v. O’Brien, No.

7:07-cv-00429-gec-mfu (W.D. Va. Sept. 25, 2007 & Oct. 30, 2007).

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 2 -