Bramley v. Painesville

691 N.E.2d 688, 81 Ohio St. 3d 1487, 1998 Ohio LEXIS 808
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedMarch 25, 1998
Docket98-309
StatusPublished

This text of 691 N.E.2d 688 (Bramley v. Painesville) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bramley v. Painesville, 691 N.E.2d 688, 81 Ohio St. 3d 1487, 1998 Ohio LEXIS 808 (Ohio 1998).

Opinion

Lake App. No. 97-L-038. This cause is pending before the court as a discretionary appeal and cross-appeal. It appears from the records of this court that appellee/eross-appellant has not filed a memorandum in response and in support of cross-appeal, due March 16, 1998, in compliance with the Rules of Practice of the Supreme Court and therefore has failed to prosecute this cause with the requisite diligence. Upon consideration thereof,

IT IS ORDERED by the court that the cross-appeal of Eugene Bramley be, and hereby is, dismissed sua sponte.

The appeal of Administrator, Bureau of Workers’ Compensation et al. remains pending.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
691 N.E.2d 688, 81 Ohio St. 3d 1487, 1998 Ohio LEXIS 808, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bramley-v-painesville-ohio-1998.