Bramlette v. State

8 So. 2d 234, 193 Miss. 24, 1942 Miss. LEXIS 95
CourtMississippi Supreme Court
DecidedMay 11, 1942
DocketNo. 35033.
StatusPublished
Cited by12 cases

This text of 8 So. 2d 234 (Bramlette v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Mississippi Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bramlette v. State, 8 So. 2d 234, 193 Miss. 24, 1942 Miss. LEXIS 95 (Mich. 1942).

Opinion

*26 Alexander, J.,

delivered the opinion of the court.

Appellant was tried and convicted by a justice of the peace upon what purported to be an affidavit charging unlawful possession of intoxicating liquor. The alleged affidavit was neither signed nor sworn to prior to his trial, but after conviction and appeal taken therefrom it was signed and sworn to by the officer who had previously procured its preparation.

Upon appeal to the circuit court appellant moved to quash the affidavit. Motion was denied, the case was tried to a jury, and defendant convicted. The error assigned is that the circuit court was without jurisdiction because the affidavit was void ab initio.

If a justice of the peace has no jurisdiction, the circuit court acquires none upon appeal. Ivy v. State, 141 Miss. 877, 106 So. 111. The affidavit is a prerequisite to prosecution for misdemeanor. Code 1930, Sec. 2098. The affidavit is the foundation of the jurisdiction of the justice of the peace. Coulter v. State, 75 Miss. 356, 22 So. 872; 22 C. J. S., Criminal Law, sec. 303, p. 457, and the court has no jurisdiction without it. Bigham v. State, 59 Miss. 529.

We are not confronted with the question to what extent an affidavit may be amended upon appeal. We have here a case where appellant was tried in the justice of the peace court without an affidavit. A paper not sworn to is not an affidavit; the oath is its essence. There was no amendment, but rather the execution, of an affidavit after trial and convictiqn. Appellant was tried without due process. The circuit court may not, by allowing the belated affidavit to stand, at once retroactively bestow upon and borrow from the justice of the peace its jurisdiction.

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Charles Oliver v. State of Mississippi
Court of Appeals of Mississippi, 2019
Williams v. State
155 So. 3d 892 (Court of Appeals of Mississippi, 2014)
Wildmon v. City of Booneville
980 So. 2d 304 (Court of Appeals of Mississippi, 2007)
Loveless v. City of Booneville
958 So. 2d 230 (Court of Appeals of Mississippi, 2007)
Faye Thomas v. City of Carthage, Mississippi
Mississippi Supreme Court, 1995
Territory v. C. Williams, AKA v. Wright
41 Haw. 348 (Hawaii Supreme Court, 1956)
Jordan v. City of West Point
75 So. 2d 465 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1954)
Hegwood v. State
39 So. 2d 865 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1949)
Ratcliff v. State
26 So. 2d 69 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1946)
Smith v. State
24 So. 2d 85 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1945)
Conner v. State
17 So. 2d 527 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1944)
Powell v. State
17 So. 2d 524 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1944)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
8 So. 2d 234, 193 Miss. 24, 1942 Miss. LEXIS 95, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bramlette-v-state-miss-1942.