Bramer v. Czapla

Missouri Court of Appeals

Bramer v. Czapla

400 S.W.3d 779, 2013 WL 69253, 2013 Mo. App. LEXIS 28

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided January 8, 2013·No. Nos. ED 95601, ED 95637·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Joseph Bramer and Lisa Rozier appeal from the judgment entered following a jury trial awarding punitive damages against them. Respondents, Vicky Czapla and Tracee Davis, filed a cross-appeal as to the trial court’s denial of their attorney’s fees. We affirm.

No error of law appears. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Joseph Bramer and Lisa Rozier appeal from the judgment entered following a jury trial awarding punitive damages against them. Respondents, Vicky Czapla and Tracee Davis, filed a cross-appeal as to the trial court’s denial of their attorney’s fees. We affirm.

No error of law appears. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Bramer v. Czapla, 400 S.W.3d 779, 2013 WL 69253, 2013 Mo. App. LEXIS 28 (Mo. Ct. App. 2013).

Pincite

400 S.W.3d 779 (Bramer v. Czapla) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.