Home/Court of Appeals of Georgia/Bramblett v. State

Bramblett v. State

99 S.E. 635, 24 Ga. App. 22, 1919 Ga. App. LEXIS 387
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedJune 13, 1919
Docket10462
StatusPublished

This text of 99 S.E. 635 (Bramblett v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bramblett v. State, 99 S.E. 635, 24 Ga. App. 22, 1919 Ga. App. LEXIS 387 (Ga. Ct. App. 1919).

Opinion

Bloodworth, J.

The special grounds of the motion for a new trial are void of merit. There is ample evidence to support the verdict. Where no error of law is committed and “there is any evidence, however slight, to support a verdict which has been approved by the trial judge, this court is absolutely without authority to control the judgment of the trial court.” Toole v. Jones, 19 Ga. App. 24 (90 S. E. 732) ; Bradham v. State, 21 Ga. App. 519 (94 S. E. 618), and cases cited.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, P. J., and Stephens, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Toole v. Jones
90 S.E. 732 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1916)
Bradham v. State
94 S.E. 618 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1917)
Tinsley v. Gullett Gin Co.
94 S.E. 892 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1917)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
99 S.E. 635, 24 Ga. App. 22, 1919 Ga. App. LEXIS 387, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bramblett-v-state-gactapp-1919.