Bramblett v. State
99 S.E. 635, 24 Ga. App. 22, 1919 Ga. App. LEXIS 387
Opinion
The special grounds of the motion for a new trial are void of merit. There is ample evidence to support the verdict. Where no error of law is committed and “there is any evidence, however slight, to support a verdict which has been approved by the trial judge, this court is absolutely without authority to control the judgment of the trial court.” Toole v. Jones, 19 Ga. App. 24 (90 S. E. 732) ; Bradham v. State, 21 Ga. App. 519 (94 S. E. 618), and cases cited.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Bramblett v. State, 99 S.E. 635, 24 Ga. App. 22, 1919 Ga. App. LEXIS 387 (Ga. Ct. App. 1919).
99 S.E. 635 (Bramblett v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Toole v. Jones
90 S.E. 732 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1916)
Bradham v. State
94 S.E. 618 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1917)
Tinsley v. Gullett Gin Co.
94 S.E. 892 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1917)