Bramble v. Heinze

Supreme Court

Bramble v. Heinze

350 U.S. 899

CourtSupreme Court of the United States

DecidedNovember 21, 1955

DocketNo. 31

StatusPublished

This text of 350 U.S. 899 (Bramble v. Heinze) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bramble v. Heinze, 350 U.S. 899 (1955).

Pincite

Opinion

On petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of California.

Per Curiam:

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for writ of certiorari are granted. Since the record in this case fails to show whether denial of petitioner’s application for habeas corpus rests on an adequate state ground or exclusively on a federal ground, the judgment of the Supreme Court of California is vacated and the cause is remanded to that court for further proceedings.

The Chief Justice took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

On petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of California.

Per Curiam:

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for writ of certiorari are granted. Since the record in this case fails to show whether denial of petitioner’s application for habeas corpus rests on an adequate state ground or exclusively on a federal ground, the judgment of the Supreme Court of California is vacated and the cause is remanded to that court for further proceedings.

The Chief Justice took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

350 U.S. 899, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bramble-v-heinze-scotus-1955.